There was no religion established in the name of HINDU on the Bharat Vrasa, although
succumbing to Historical blunders long ago we have changed our SANATAN DHARM
into HINDU. Just left the Issue of HINDUS, many are there who can’t tolerate
even recitation of the word HINDU. Some of my friends even suggested me not to cite
HINDUSTAN. As Usual, all the Seculo-Liberandu Left Congi Brigades strongly
criticize the concept of HINDU as according to them it is against the SECULAR
fabrics. By the By, I don’t consider their debates as worthy as I think all of
them suffer from INTELLECTUAL DIARRHOEA.
Now come to
the word HINDU or SANATAN DHARM
Every Hindu, Sikh,
Jains, Buddhists (Especially Vajryana) does Sankalp (Resolution) before any
Sadhana (Disciplined and Dedicated Spiritual or Religious Practice), though the procedure of sankalps are different but the connotation is similar. Sankalp is
the foundation of the Sanatan Culture. Without the Sankalp we believe all the
Noble Works are futile.
WHAT WE RECITE
IN SANKALP?

This Sankalp
(Resolution) speaks much about the Indic Culture. Religion has some basic
characteristics (a) a prophet (b) a fixed religious scripture/text (c) certain
moral duties (d) some supernatural narrations of prophecies. According to it
we can divide all the religions are in to two broad categories (1) creed
Religion (2) Complete Religion. Islam, Christianity etc. Complete religion
(Hindu/Sanatan).
WHY HINDUISM
IS COMPLETE & DIFFERENT FROM OTHERS?
(a) It has no
PROPHETS, no one started this (b) Though Veda is a Final Point of Sanatan
Scripture, yet it has no fixed RELIGIOUS IDEOLOGIES (c) There is No certain
prescribed MORAL OBLIGATIONS towards the RELIGION, eg one should do Namaz six
times a day, or Observe Ramjan etc. Or Sunday prayer in Churches, (d) the HINDU/SANATAN
is not SUPERNATURAL but SPIRITUAL, it is not TRANSCENDENTAL but SYMBOLIC.
WHAT IS UNITY
IN DIVERSITY?
The basic concept
of Unity in Diversity is derived from “ALL IS NOTHING BUT THE GOD’S INCARNATION”
(Adwitabad), a spiritual realisation. So it has no POLITICAL CONNOTATION, what
we today apply to describe SECULARISM.