Saturday, August 19, 2017

India: Close to Cataclysm


Whether human beings are capable enough to reshape the Nature according to their will or Nature restructures the life, the debate going on for the Charles Darwin’s “Natural selection.” It postulates that only nature has the capacity to determine the process of Biological Evolution. The most intelligent Human beings are incapable to impede the process. But the recent development of “gene technology’ takes the Theory granted. We now claim that in near future we can modify not only human life but also other animated things according to the changing environment.
Prior to the Darwin, Thomas Robert Malthus in his book “Essay on the Principle of the population (1789)’ opined in each uniform interval of time with the increase of the arithmetic food growth the population is capable of increasing geometric progression. The simultaneous increase of arithmetic food growth and geometric population growth predicted a future when humans have no resource to survive on. When such situation arises, the population will be checked by war, famine, or disease. It then drops below the food supply. As the population recovers, so the cycle continues.
He projected that the in 200 years earth’s population is capable enough to grow to 260 billion. By the time the subsistence was only capable to increase to feed 9 billion people.  His calculation and projection seem to be true until WW2 (total world population was 2.3 billion), but since then the population and production of food growing dramatically. According to the recent data (USDA foreign agriculture service), total food grains supply (2017/18- projection) is 3181.18 million metric ton and use is 2,648.15 million metric ton for the population of 7.5 billion (April, 2017). It means we are producing food sufficient for the 12 billion people. According to the statistics, it seems that we are not in a shortage of food supply to the demand, but in contrary the according to the state of food insecurity of the world (2015) 10.9% of the total world population is living undernourished (living lack of sufficient quality food).In addition to this the considerable amount of the unnecessary wastage of food.
Now come to the India, according to the data provided by the Ministry of Agriculture (February, 2017) the total food production of the country is 271.98 million ton and sufficient for its 1.25 billion people. But in converse India also ranks 97 among 118 countries in the world hunger list with 194 million people. In addition to this we are wasting 70 million of foods every year.
Both the world and National figures shows the anomalies of unequal distribution of foods, and unnecessary food shortage.


I have presented the figures only to understand the situation of the climate change and related poverty, mass migration, death due to famine and subsequent psychological change of the human population. My point of discussion is not on these things particularly but to reveal the relation of the behavioural changes to the climate.
It is evident from the human history that the human activities are directly linked to the environmental and geographical phenomenon. For example, human civilization flourished better in a favourable environment like fertile river plains, unlike harsh climates. It is also proved that the cognitive process like spatial reasoning, decision making, and behaviour conditioned by the geographical situation. We can conclude that the human world is the ever-changing result of individual and group human actions, working within natural and institutional framework. Sometimes physical landscape modified by the human activities which is more or less regulated by the social, cultural and political (governmental) institution. These modifications later influence the environment and persuade the human behaviour.
According to the Vedic philosophy; the basic elements of nature like Water, Earth, Fire, Air and Ether although remains more or less same in every human being. But the ratio of the ‘Driving Forces of nature’, like Satva, Rajas and Tamas inured the human personality/reasoning/decision making. It manipulates its environment according to its disposition. The excess activities of Rajas and Tamas endanger the environment and subsequently its own existence.
From the above, we can deduce that whatever may be the technological progress we made it cannot make us capable enough to reshape the natural phenomena, altogether. It may be presumed that at this present juncture Human psychology is a bondslave of the climate, which influences our behaviour.
Now with the growing problems like higher rates of migration, rise of sea level, increasing unviable spaces for human habitation, spreading of new parasitic deceases etc compels us to link it with the climate change. Day by day scientists are finding more and more links with changing Climate and behavioural pattern of the humans. Some of the observations/Research can be summarised as follows;
1.       Warmer temperature will lead to more violence and conflict
In 2013, Solomon M. Hsiang,Marshall Burke, Edward Miguel in their research paper ‘Quantifying the Influence of Climate on Human Conflict’ pointed out that “median estimates indicate that the frequency of interpersonal violence rises 4% and the frequency of intergroup conflict rises 14%. Because locations throughout the inhabited world are expected to warm 2 to 4σ by 2050, amplified rates of human conflict could represent a large and critical impact of anthropogenic climate change.”
2.       Climate Change Will Increase The Incidence & Severity Of Mental Illness.


(Continued....Part-2)

Saturday, August 12, 2017

When a Nation under Pervert Nationalists (Part-1)


There was a time when India listened to me ...today I’m a back number” this was the reaction of Mahatma Gandhi to Lord Mountbatten when latter appealed Gandhiji to do some miracle in Delhi like he had during communal violence in East Bengal and Kohat in the North-western Frontier Province.
This was during September-October, 1947, at that time Delhi flooded with desperate, tormented refugees from Pakistan, who cared nothing but their life and future and an opportunity to unleash vengeance for their sufferings in Pakistan. The entire Government of India has remained in a perplexity between the “rehabilitation of the world’s largest refugees, unprecedented settlement issues of the partition and the Kashmir problem”
Gandhiji was well-known about the changing psychological condition of the people of India. He told to his secretary Pyarelal as quoted by Manohar Malgonkar in his “The man who killed Gandhi”, “we are biding fair to say goodbye to non-violence.”
Though he was much concerned about the communal harmony than the Political and administrative issues, which was also justified, as it was the responsibility of the government. He pressurized Nehru and Patel to take all necessary steps so that the communal harmony between two communities prevailed. Gandhiji exhorted them, “If Delhi goes, India goes, and with that goes the last hope of World Peace.”
The problem with Mahtama Gandhi has he tackled the situation as a saint, a pious heart which throbbed for Peace, Non-violence, and Brotherhood, not as a Politician. Gandhiji tried his best to pacify the situation through his ultimate weapon “fast unto death”. Before, with this, he had successfully forced the most obstinate situation to genuflect. But this time the situation was different, people had little care about him, moreover, they (refugees) shouted: “let Gandhi die, Give us shelter.” The latter part of the whole state of affairs is well known to everyone. The Messiah of peace and non-violent assassinated by his own man, whom really believed as “Amrutasya Putrah” (children of nectar).
The situation of hatredness at present circumstance is similar but not identical when we are celebrating the 70 years of our Independence and 75 years of Quit India movement. Many instances are there which fuelled the communal tension, but the sagacity of Gandhiji’s concept, idealism prevented the nation from break apart. Although many Political parties effectively encashed the communal, religious revulsion, once they got elected through democratic process to form a government they at least pretended to be the followers of the secularism and Gandhian Ideals. However, at present-day government lead by Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) is quite different from the previous government. This is quite evident when Hamid Ansari (a two-term vice president of India) in his farewell remark pointed out the growing “intolerance” “feeling of insecurity” among the masses, the entire BJP and its allies reacted violently to him. They termed Mr. Ansari’s statement as anti-national and linked him to a mafia don-turned politician (Mukhtar Ansari).
I’m not going through all the instances like when Narendra Modi as Gujarat Chief Minister did not show an iota of remorse to the 2002 Gujarat violence where more than 2000 persons from a particular minority community massacred by the majority community. He had said in an interview, “Another thing, any person if we are driving a car, we are a driver, and someone else is driving a car and we're sitting behind, even then if a puppy comes under the wheel, will be painful or not?  Similarly, in Uttar Pradesh, the Hindu Yuva Vahini Armies of Yogi Adityanath, a Mahanta turned Chief minister sloganed “Gorakhpur mein rahena ho to Yogi yogi kahena hoga”( If you want to remain in Gorakhpur you must chant Yogi Yogi) . In another instance, BJP chief minister from Haryana, Manoharlal Khatar reacted “If you want freedom, why don't they just roam around naked?” when BJP state president’s son accused of “attempt abduction” of an IAS officer’s daughter.
BJP came to power at the center with absolute majority (282 seats in Loksabh)after two decades, within three years it formed it’s government almost in 18 states, became majority party in upper house with 58 representatives( August, 2017), it also effortlessly elected its candidates as president of India, Vice president of India, Speaker of Lower house. Besides this, appointed the officers who are having analogous to its ideology at the key positions like Niti Ayog, RBI governor, National Security Adviser (NSA), Economic Advisor.
BJP came to power with alluring promises like rejuvenating Nationalism, corruption free governance, Ideal based Politics. Out of total votes 31% popular votes (171,660,230) polled in support of the BJP. According to an independent estimation, among the popular votes polled for BJP most are the youngsters. It is a matter of rejoice that when India gradually losing its faith on the democratic electoral system the BJP reaffirmed it. But the irony is that soon the Party which comes to power through a democratic system based on the glorious traditions of universal brotherhood, acceptance, compassion, non-violence thoroughly planned to break it. By all the tricks and tactics it gradually pushes its Hindu Nationalist agenda.
A moth’s back an email (pic-1) from an editor of a news agency reached me; in it he paid a high praise for Narendra Modi. The narration goes on how Mr. Modi wants how to change the constitution, the election system etc. What he has related to the Mr. Modi may be his personal view but there are similar views flooded in all the social media platforms. I investigated and found that all is a part of BJP’s Propaganda strategy.

How they used a well-planned propaganda to tackle every situation is evident from the following incident,
Yogi Adityanath, before becoming the chief minister of Uttar Pradesh was very much popular for his Hardcore Hindutva agenda and guts. The yardstick to measure the “guts” of Yogi Adityanath is from two angles one is people perception of his caste to which he belongs, secondly, his series of alleged actions towards particular community /caste.
In January 2007, Uttar Pradesh Government run by Samajwadi Party had taken a few preventive steps to check Yogi Adityanath’s alleged plan to instigate communal violence, then who was a BJP MP from Gorakhpur constituency. The state government had withdrawn Yogi’s security cover ad put him behind bars for 11 days. After releasing in bail, when he attended the Loksabha, in zero hour, while narrating he state government action against him, he broke into tears, he appealed speaker for his protection.
As narrated by Dhirendra K. Jha in his “shadow Armies”- “The Sight of Adityanath shedding tears shocked Thakur Supporters. It was seen as a sign o weakness, unbecoming of a male belonging to a martial caste.  Soon, However, his subordinates, Hindu Yuva Vahini, and BJP started re building his image, arguing that he was a sensitive man, full of emotions even as many locals called him a coward capable only of spreading mob violence.”

(Continued...

Thursday, July 20, 2017

Individual Freedom under attack from a delusional government and subjective Justice



“Nobody gets Justice. People only get Good Luck or Bad Luck.”- Orson Welles

After hour-long analysis I found the above quote positively appropriate to the Supreme Court of India’s (SC) recent observation on Freedom and Liberty during the hearing arguments to determine whether right to privacy is fundamental right under the constitution sought to know if the right to privacy will also extend to one’s choice of family and sexual orientation.(http://indianexpress.com/article/india/right-to-privacy-aadhaar-act-supreme-court-justice-khehar-not-absolute-4758342/)
While hearing the arguments on the first day, one of the learned judges asked the petitioner, “If privacy is right to make choice, choice in what area — family, sexual orientation, gender identity, surveillance. what all?” 
In another question, the same judge asked if it can be said that “privacy rights are not only vertical (not only against state action) but also horizontal (against society) and imposes an obligation on the state to make laws to protect one’s existence in society?”
There are maybe more arguments on several other questions and answers, but these two questions of the bench wondered me more.
In my opinion, both the questions are somehow more subjective than objective. Why?
At first, I’m going to through some lights on justice. The prime objective of the justice is to protect the virtue and Truth. It affects four – criminals/defendants, plaintiffs/witnesses, the assessors of the court and the Constitution/Government. If unjustly decided it brings evil to these four. Similarly, a judicial proceeding brings four results Justice, Gains, renown, and esteem.
In the context of the above observations, it can be inferred as that the questions put forth is more subjective for a court which upholds world’s largest written constitution and the thousand year’s virtuous judicial tradition which upholds human values and Truth.
As the right to privacy is not specifically mentioned in our constitution but it is derivative from the fundamental rights and also regulated by the fundamental duties. Where it is concluded that right to privacy is not absolute when the matter comes to National security and welfare of the society at a large.
It is an irony of the fate of Indians that after 70 years of hard-earned freedom we are at the starting point to decide our Freedom and Liberty. Again it is a great mockery of human existence, a democratically elected government standing opposite to it and acting as the dictatorial authority of human liberty.

While finding a solution to this, let’s remind the words of Swami Vivekananda-"Liberty in thought and action is the only condition of life, growth, and well-being: Where it does not exist, the man, the race, and the nation must go down." It is the reasonable freedom which awakens a human being on the difference between good and evil. It inspires human being to respect others freedom. Eventually, it creates a conducive environment where a human being gets an opportunity to be a constructive part of human society.
Conversely, humans are living for a reason and for a reason. If a system infringes its right to choose one’s own destiny then it is also an infringement of the law of nature.
The Past is evident whenever any system contravened the freedom and wanted to reshape the destiny of a human society on prejudices and delusion, the doomsday is apparent.
Herbert Hoover’s observation on it clearly signifies, “Freedom is the open window through which pours the sunlight of the human spirit and human dignity.”
Lambodar07@gmail.com


Tuesday, March 14, 2017

Our PM Narendra Modi broke People's belief restoring "Horse Trading"

I am uploading this Video (Edited) to remind in 2014 people of India voted him against corruption and corrupt practice of the Congress Government, but promoting Horse Trading in Goa and Manipur and alleged restoring EVM fraud to win Uttar Pradesh he has broken all the aspirations and belief of 125 crore people.